Electric vehicles (EVs) are driving the demand for lightweight, high-strength battery components—battery trays, which house and protect lithium-ion battery packs, are no exception. These trays must balance three core requirements: reduced weight (to extend EV range), sufficient strength (to withstand impact and vibration), and corrosion resistance (to protect battery life). 439 ferritic stainless steel has emerged as a top candidate for this application, thanks to its lower cost than austenitic grades (e.g., 304) and excellent formability. The key to unlocking its lightweight potential lies in the thinning stretch (ironing) process, controlled to a thinning rate of ≤20% to ensure strength isn’t compromised. This article details the optimized ironing process for 439 steel battery trays and the strategies to guarantee structural performance.
Why 439 Stainless Steel Is a Game-Changer for EV Battery Trays
EV battery trays demand materials that combine lightweight properties, mechanical strength, and cost-effectiveness. 439 steel (17% Cr, 0.2% Ti) outperforms traditional materials like carbon steel and even other stainless grades for this specific use case:
Weight Advantage: Density of 7.7 g/cm³, paired with excellent formability, allows controlled thinning without excessive material loss—15-20% lighter than carbon steel trays when using the same design.
Strength and Ductility Balance: Tensile strength of 420-550 MPa and elongation of ≥25%—ideal for withstanding the dynamic loads of vehicle operation (e.g., potholes, collisions).
Corrosion Resistance: Titanium stabilization prevents intergranular corrosion, critical for protecting battery packs from road salt, moisture, and debris.
Cost Efficiency: 20-30% lower cost than 304 stainless steel, making it scalable for mass-produced EVs.
Unlike austenitic stainless steels, 439’s ferritic structure avoids work hardening issues during forming, making it perfect for the ironing process.
Thinning Stretch (Ironing) Process for 439 Steel: Controlling Thinning Rate ≤20%
Ironing is a cold forming process that reduces the thickness of 439 steel sheets (typically 1.2-2.0 mm initial thickness) while maintaining the tray’s geometric integrity. Controlling the thinning rate to ≤20% is critical—exceeding this limit causes material embrittlement and strength loss. Below is the optimized process flow:
1. Pre-Forming Preparation: Ensuring Material Uniformity
Proper preparation eliminates defects that could fail during ironing:
Material Selection: Use 439 steel sheets with grain size 6-8 (ASTM E112) for optimal formability—finer grains prevent localized thinning.
Surface Cleaning: Degrease with alkaline solution (50°C, 10 minutes) and rinse with deionized water to remove oil and contaminants, avoiding die sticking.
Annealing Treatment: For sheets with prior cold work, anneal at 780-820°C for 5 minutes and air cool to restore ductility (elongation increases by 10-15%).
2. Ironing Process Parameters: Precision Control for ≤20% Thinning
The process uses a hydraulic press with a punch and die set, with parameters tailored to 439 steel’s properties:
Initial Thickness: 1.5 mm (most common for battery trays); target final thickness: 1.2-1.3 mm (thinning rate 13-20%).
Die Angle: 8-12°—a smaller angle reduces friction but increases forming force; a larger angle risks uneven thinning.
Forming Speed: 50-80 mm/s—slower speeds (≤50 mm/s) for complex tray shapes; faster speeds for flat areas to improve efficiency.
Lubrication: Use water-based graphite lubricant (viscosity 150-200 cSt) to reduce die wear and ensure uniform material flow.
Key check: Measure thickness at 5 critical points (4 corners + center) after ironing—variation must be ≤0.1 mm to avoid weak spots.
3. Post-Ironing Trimming and Shaping
Final processing refines the tray to meet dimensional requirements without compromising strength:
Trimming: Use laser cutting (speed 2-3 m/min) to remove excess material—avoids mechanical stress from shearing.
Edge Deburring: Electrochemical deburring to round edges (radius 0.2-0.3 mm), preventing stress concentration and corrosion initiation.
Strength Assurance Strategies: Keeping Performance High After Thinning
Controlling thinning rate to ≤20% is the first step, but additional measures ensure the tray meets EV safety standards (e.g., ISO 12405 for battery pack mechanical testing):
1. Microstructure Optimization: Enhancing Strength Through Processing
The ironing process induces controlled work hardening in 439 steel, offsetting strength loss from thinning:
Work Hardening Effect: A 20% thinning rate increases 439’s tensile strength from 450 MPa to 580 MPa—exceeding the 500 MPa minimum requirement for battery trays.
Microstructure Analysis: Post-ironing, the ferritic grain structure becomes elongated along the forming direction, improving directional strength (e.g., resistance to longitudinal bending).
2. Reinforcement Design for High-Stress Areas
Battery trays experience the most stress at the edges, corners, and battery mounting points—targeted reinforcement is key:
Bead Reinforcements: Add 2-3 mm deep longitudinal beads in the tray bottom (spacing 50-80 mm) to increase bending stiffness by 35%.
Corner Radius Optimization: Use 10-15 mm corner radii (vs. 5-8 mm for non-thinned trays) to distribute impact stress evenly.
Mounting Bosses: Integrate thickened mounting bosses (thickness 1.8-2.0 mm) via partial forming—no need for separate welding, reducing weight by 8% vs. welded designs.
3. Mechanical Testing and Validation
Rigorous testing confirms the tray’s strength meets real-world demands:
Test Type | Standard | Test Condition | Pass Criterion | 439 Steel Tray Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bending Test | ISO 7438 | 10 kN load, 10 mm deflection | No permanent deformation | Pass (0.2 mm recovery) |
Impact Test | ISO 12405 | 50 J impact energy | No cracks or material failure | Pass (minor dent, no cracks) |
Vibration Test | SAE J1455 | 10-2000 Hz, 40 hours | No structural damage | Pass (stable performance) |
4. Corrosion Protection: Extending Service Life
Strength assurance isn’t just about mechanics—corrosion weakens structures over time. 439 steel’s inherent corrosion resistance is enhanced with post-processing:
Passivation: Citric acid passivation (5% solution, 60°C, 20 minutes) to thicken the chromium oxide film, improving salt spray resistance by 50%.
Edge Sealing: Apply a 5-10 μm organic coating to trimmed edges, preventing crevice corrosion from road debris.
Lightweight and Cost Benefits: 439 Steel vs. Alternatives
A comparison with common battery tray materials highlights 439 steel’s advantages after optimized ironing:
vs. 304 Stainless Steel: 439 trays are 10% lighter (due to lower nickel content) and 25% cheaper, with similar corrosion resistance for automotive use.
vs. Carbon Steel (with Galvanization): 439 trays are 5% lighter, 100% more corrosion-resistant (no galvanic corrosion issues), and have a 2x longer service life.
vs. Aluminum Alloy (6061): 439 is 30% cheaper and has 40% higher tensile strength, though 20% heavier—ideal for budget-conscious EV manufacturers prioritizing safety.
Real-World Application: 439 Steel Trays in Compact EVs
A Chinese EV manufacturer adopted 439 steel battery trays (1.5 mm initial thickness, 1.2 mm final thickness, 20% thinning rate) for its compact EV model. After 2 years of mass production:
EV range increased by 8 km (from 312 km to 320 km) due to the 1.2 kg weight reduction per tray.
Warranty claims related to battery tray damage dropped by 60% compared to previous carbon steel trays.
Production costs decreased by 18%—savings passed to consumers, boosting sales by 12%.
Trays passed 500.000 km durability testing with no signs of corrosion or structural weakening.
Key Considerations for Mass Production
Die Maintenance: Use tungsten carbide dies for ironing—service life of 50.000 parts vs. 10.000 for tool steel dies, reducing downtime.
Quality Control: Implement in-line thickness measurement (ultrasonic sensors) to reject parts with thinning rate >20%—defect rate reduced to <0.3%.
Material Supply: Source 439 steel with consistent titanium content (0.15-0.25%) to avoid batch-to-batch formability variations.
Conclusion: 439 Steel Delivers Lightweight, Strong Battery Trays
The combination of 439 ferritic stainless steel and the controlled thinning stretch process (thinning rate ≤20%) solves the EV battery tray’s core challenge: balancing lightweight design with structural strength. 439 steel’s formability allows efficient ironing, while work hardening from the process offsets strength loss from thinning. Targeted reinforcement designs and rigorous testing ensure the trays meet safety and durability standards, while its cost advantage over austenitic stainless steels and corrosion resistance over carbon steel make it scalable for mass production. As EV manufacturers race to extend range and reduce costs, 439 steel battery trays stand out as a practical, high-performance solution—proving that smart material selection and optimized processing are the keys to lightweight automotive components.
Products
Phone
